Compare shoes
Pick up to 3 shoes to see them side by side.
 ASICSGel-Kayano 33 |  PumaForeverRun Nitro | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall | 8.33 | 7.67 |
| Ride | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| Design & Comfort | 9.0 | 7.5 |
| Value | 8.0 | 7.5 |
| Price | ||
| Price | ₹16,999 | ₹8,999 |
| Specs | ||
| Category | Stability | Stability |
| Weight | 300 g | 274 g |
| Heel stack | 39 mm | 36.1 mm |
| Forefoot stack | 31 mm | 26.1 mm |
| Drop | 8 mm | 10 mm |
| Foam | FF Blast Max (top) + FF Blast Plus Eco (base) | Nitro (dual density with a firmer foam) |
| Plate | – | – |
| Fit | ||
| Support | stability | mild support |
| Fit | standard | wide |
| Sizing | – | – |
| Recommended runner weight | All runners, including heavy (90 kg+) | All runners, including heavy (90 kg+) |
| Best for | ||
| Best for | Long runsRace dayBeginnersWalkingRunners 90 kg+ | Easy runsLong runsTempoBeginnersRunners 90 kg+ |
| Pros | Soft, bouncy FF Blast Max top layer · Stable firmer base layer · Plush heel and tongue padding · More breathable than the Kayano 32 · 8 mm drop · Comfortable on 20 km long runs · Safe option for a first full marathon · Suits flat, neutral and high arches | Bouncy Nitro foam, rare in a stability shoe · Works at slow and fast paces · Light, non-intrusive heel clip for mild support · Snug midfoot with a wide forefoot and roomy toe box · Excellent grip · Acceptable outsole wear after 500 km · Lighter than the Kayano at 280 g |
| Cons | Durability doubts for runners over 90 kg · About 20% less structure than the Kayano 32 · Too soft for severe overpronators who dislike soft foam · Not for wide feet in the standard width · Expensive at ₹17,000 | Upper developed a cut · Only mild stability · Rarely discounted, long sold at ₹16,000 |
| Avoid if | Avoid it if you are over 90 kg with flat feet, or overpronate heavily and dislike soft foam; the Kayano 32 suits you better. | Avoid it if you need aggressive stability or prefer the plush, highly protective feel of the Kayano. |