Compare shoes
Pick up to 3 shoes to see them side by side.
 ASICSGel-Kayano 33 |  NikeStructure Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall | 8.33 | 7.50 |
| Ride | 8.0 | 7.5 |
| Design & Comfort | 9.0 | 8.0 |
| Value | 8.0 | 7.0 |
| Price | ||
| Price | ₹16,999 | ₹14,995 |
| Specs | ||
| Category | Stability | Stability |
| Weight | 300 g | 309 g |
| Heel stack | 39 mm | 42 mm |
| Forefoot stack | 31 mm | 32 mm |
| Drop | 8 mm | 10 mm |
| Foam | FF Blast Max (top) + FF Blast Plus Eco (base) | ZoomX |
| Plate | – | – |
| Fit | ||
| Support | stability | mild support |
| Fit | standard | standard |
| Sizing | – | true to size |
| Recommended runner weight | Up to 90 kg (durability is questionable above that) | Up to 90 kg |
| Best for | ||
| Best for | Long runsRace dayBeginnersWalkingRunners 90 kg+ | – |
| Pros | Soft, bouncy FF Blast Max top layer on a stable base · Plush heel and tongue padding · More breathable than the Kayano 32 · Comfortable on 20 km long runs · Safe option for a first full marathon | Most energetic foam among my support shoes (ZoomX) · Max cushion with a modern design that helps the ankle without stressing the foot · Nike street-wear look |
| Cons | Durability doubts for runners over 90 kg · About 20% less structure than the Kayano 32 · Not for wide feet in the standard width · Expensive at ₹17,000 | Doesn't feel like a proper long-run shoe · Feels more like an all-day wear and walking shoe |
| Avoid if | You are over 90 kg with flat feet, or overpronate heavily and dislike soft foam; the Kayano 32 suits you better. | Avoid it if you want one shoe for long runs. Lively as ZoomX is, it feels more like an all-day wear and walking shoe. |