Compare shoes
Pick up to 3 shoes to see them side by side.
 ASICSGT-2000 13 |  New Balance860 v14 | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall | 7.33 | 8.17 |
| Ride | 7.5 | 8.0 |
| Design & Comfort | 7.0 | 8.0 |
| Value | 7.5 | 8.5 |
| Price | ||
| Price | ₹15,000 | ₹15,000 |
| Specs | ||
| Category | Stability | Stability |
| Weight | 264 g | 306 g |
| Heel stack | 36.6 mm | – |
| Forefoot stack | 27.2 mm | – |
| Drop | 9.4 mm | – |
| Foam | FF Blast Plus | – |
| Plate | – | nylon/Pebax plate |
| Fit | ||
| Support | mild support | stability |
| Fit | narrow | narrow |
| Sizing | go up half | go up half |
| Recommended runner weight | Under 85 kg | All runners, including heavy (90 kg+) |
| Best for | ||
| Best for | Easy runsLong runsBeginnersWalking | Easy runsBeginnersWalkingRunners 90 kg+ |
| Pros | FF Blast Plus midsole: stable, cushioned, with energy return · No break-in needed · Extra heel softness from PureGEL · Moderate, non-intrusive 3D Guidance support · Wide, stable platform · Premium, breathable engineered mesh upper · Strong heel counter, padding and tongue · Thick, durable outsole rubber · Light at 260 g (US 9) · Excellent value at ₹5,000–6,500 | Bounce and energy return rare in a stability shoe · Strong, traditional stability: wide platform, raised medial foam, plate · Premium engineered mesh upper and build · Thick outsole with good traction · Foam expected to last 1,000 km · Great value at ₹6,000–9,000 |
| Cons | Snug, narrow forefoot, needs half a size up · Thick, not very soft upper mesh · Short laces, runner's knot came loose · Below-average traction on wet surfaces · Not for interval or speed sessions · Not enough for heavy runners or severe overpronators | Runs about a full size small · Snug fit even after sizing up · Not for fast paces around 4:00/km |
| Avoid if | Avoid it if you weigh over 85 kg or overpronate heavily, where the Kayano 31 is the better choice. | Avoid it if you want a shoe for fast running around 4:00/km pace. |