Compare shoes
Pick up to 3 shoes to see them side by side.
ASICSGT-1000 13 | New Balance860 v14 | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall | 6.33 | 8.17 |
| Ride | 6.0 | 8.0 |
| Design & Comfort | 7.0 | 8.0 |
| Value | 6.0 | 8.5 |
| Price | ||
| Price | ₹5,000 | ₹15,000 |
| Specs | ||
| Category | Stability | Stability |
| Weight | 276 g | 306 g |
| Heel stack | 33.7 mm | – |
| Forefoot stack | 25 mm | – |
| Drop | 8.7 mm | – |
| Foam | AMPLIFOAM Plus | – |
| Plate | – | nylon/Pebax plate |
| Fit | ||
| Support | mild support | stability |
| Fit | wide | narrow |
| Sizing | – | go up half |
| Recommended runner weight | Very light runners | All runners, including heavy (90 kg+) |
| Best for | ||
| Best for | BeginnersWalking | Easy runsBeginnersWalkingRunners 90 kg+ |
| Pros | Premium-feeling materials for the price · Thick heel padding and stiff heel counter · Long, premium laces · Moderate, non-intrusive 3D Guidance support · Wide platform for a stable ride · Compact, feels lighter than its 270–280 g · Smooth heel-to-toe transition · Amazing step-in comfort, superb walking shoe | Bounce and energy return rare in a stability shoe · Strong, traditional stability: wide platform, raised medial foam, plate · Premium engineered mesh upper and build · Thick outsole with good traction · Foam expected to last 1,000 km · Great value at ₹6,000–9,000 |
| Cons | Midsole lacks impact protection, ankles and calves worked extra · Not enough for excessive overpronation · Very flexible, durability doubtful · Outsole rubber feels softer than on premium ASICS · Lacks the ASICS feel of cheaper Gel Excite 10 and Gel-Pulse · Not worth the retail price | Runs about a full size small · Snug fit even after sizing up · Not for fast paces around 4:00/km |
| Avoid if | Avoid it if you are a serious runner wanting a ₹5,000 shoe that lasts 800 km, or if you overpronate excessively. | Avoid it if you want a shoe for fast running around 4:00/km pace. |

