Compare shoes
Pick up to 3 shoes to see them side by side.
 ASICSGlideRide Max 2 |  NikeVomero Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall | 6.83 | 8.50 |
| Ride | 6.0 | 8.5 |
| Design & Comfort | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| Value | 6.5 | 9.0 |
| Price | ||
| Price | – | ₹16,000 |
| Specs | ||
| Category | Max cushion | Max cushion |
| Weight | 261 g | 281 g |
| Heel stack | 46 mm | 45 mm |
| Forefoot stack | 40 mm | 35 mm |
| Drop | 6 mm | 10 mm |
| Foam | FF Blast Max (top) and FF Blast Plus Eco (bottom), dual density | ZoomX |
| Plate | – | – |
| Fit | ||
| Support | – | neutral |
| Fit | – | – |
| Sizing | go up half | – |
| Recommended runner weight | All runners, including heavy (90 kg+) | Up to about 90 kg |
| Best for | ||
| Best for | Long runsWalkingRunners 90 kg+ | Long runsWalking |
| Pros | Very stable, firm platform with no wobble · Strong rocker makes toe-off smooth · Thin, soft, breathable woven upper, much better than version 1 · Gusseted tongue, thick padding and a solid heel counter · Excellent grip on normal surfaces · One of the best shoes for walking and plantar fasciitis · Massive 46/40 mm stack for long-run protection | Springy, energetic ZoomX ride · Light and breathable for a max-cushion shoe · Foam didn't flatten over a half marathon · Helps when you pick up the pace · Excellent, durable grip · Plush heel padding and tongue, no heel slippage · Reflective details, expected to last over 1,000 km |
| Cons | No energy return or responsiveness at 6:00 to 7:00/km · Not suited to short runs · Runs small, I needed half a size up · Poor value at ₹17,000 to ₹18,000 · Narrow appeal, will not suit runners who want a soft, plush feel | Expensive at ₹16,000 in India · Only on Nike's website, imported with tax · Unstable for paces slower than 6 min/km · Not for heavy runners or weak ankles |
| Avoid if | Avoid it if you want a soft, plush ride like the Nimbus or an energetic, bouncy shoe for faster running. | Avoid it if you run slower than 6 min/km, are a heavy runner, or have ankle stability problems. |