Compare shoes
Pick up to 3 shoes to see them side by side.
 ASICSGel-Kayano 33 |  SauconyTempus 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall | 8.33 | 7.83 |
| Ride | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| Design & Comfort | 9.0 | 7.5 |
| Value | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| Price | ||
| Price | ₹17,000 | ₹7,000 |
| Specs | ||
| Category | Stability | Stability |
| Weight | 300 g | 260 g |
| Heel stack | 39 mm | 36.8 mm |
| Forefoot stack | 31 mm | 26.7 mm |
| Drop | 8 mm | 10.1 mm |
| Foam | FF Blast Max (top) + FF Blast Plus Eco (base) | PWRRUN PB and PWRRUN blend |
| Plate | – | – |
| Fit | ||
| Support | stability | mild support |
| Fit | standard | standard |
| Sizing | – | – |
| Recommended runner weight | All runners, including heavy (90 kg+) | Up to about 90 kg |
| Best for | ||
| Best for | Long runsRace dayBeginnersWalkingRunners 90 kg+ | Walking |
| Pros | Soft, bouncy FF Blast Max top layer · Stable firmer base layer · Plush heel and tongue padding · More breathable than the Kayano 32 · 8 mm drop · Comfortable on 20 km long runs · Safe option for a first full marathon · Suits flat, neutral and high arches | Softest stability shoe he has tried · Good rebound for a stability shoe · Light, about 260 g in US 9 · Light upper with good toe box height · Gusseted tongue and strong heel clip · Versatile, one shoe for all training · Comfortable for walking |
| Cons | Durability doubts for runners over 90 kg · About 20% less structure than the Kayano 32 · Too soft for severe overpronators who dislike soft foam · Not for wide feet in the standard width · Expensive at ₹17,000 | Outsole grip felt unsure on loose gravel · Outsole durability doubtful beyond 500 km · Tight medial side · High arch may irritate neutral or high-arched runners · Not for wide feet in the standard width |
| Avoid if | Avoid it if you are over 90 kg with flat feet, or overpronate heavily and dislike soft foam; the Kayano 32 suits you better. | Avoid it if you are a neutral runner or have high arches, as the raised arch can cause irritation. |