Compare shoes
Pick up to 3 shoes to see them side by side.
 ASICSGel-Kayano 33 |  New Balance860 v15 | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall | 8.33 | 7.67 |
| Ride | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| Design & Comfort | 9.0 | 7.0 |
| Value | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| Price | ||
| Price | ₹16,999 | ₹16,999 |
| Specs | ||
| Category | Stability | Stability |
| Weight | 300 g | 329 g |
| Heel stack | 39 mm | 40 mm |
| Forefoot stack | 31 mm | 34 mm |
| Drop | 8 mm | 6 mm |
| Foam | FF Blast Max (top) + FF Blast Plus Eco (base) | Fresh Foam X |
| Plate | – | – |
| Fit | ||
| Support | stability | stability |
| Fit | standard | – |
| Sizing | – | go up half |
| Recommended runner weight | Up to 90 kg (durability is questionable above that) | Up to 120 kg |
| Best for | ||
| Best for | Long runsRace dayBeginnersWalkingRunners 90 kg+ | – |
| Pros | Soft, bouncy FF Blast Max top layer on a stable base · Plush heel and tongue padding · More breathable than the Kayano 32 · Comfortable on 20 km long runs · Safe option for a first full marathon | One of the most protective max-cushion shoes · Rocker eased my plantar fasciitis · Great for flat feet |
| Cons | Durability doubts for runners over 90 kg · About 20% less structure than the Kayano 32 · Not for wide feet in the standard width · Expensive at ₹17,000 | Heavier · Not responsive · Runs half a size small |
| Avoid if | You are over 90 kg with flat feet, or overpronate heavily and dislike soft foam; the Kayano 32 suits you better. | Avoid it if you want a light or responsive shoe. It is heavy, and it runs half a size small. |