Compare shoes
Pick up to 3 shoes to see them side by side.
 ASICSGel-Kayano 33 |  New Balance860 v14 | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall | 8.33 | 8.17 |
| Ride | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| Design & Comfort | 9.0 | 8.0 |
| Value | 8.0 | 8.5 |
| Price | ||
| Price | ₹17,000 | ₹15,000 |
| Specs | ||
| Category | Stability | Stability |
| Weight | 300 g | 306 g |
| Heel stack | 39 mm | – |
| Forefoot stack | 31 mm | – |
| Drop | 8 mm | – |
| Foam | FF Blast Max (top) + FF Blast Plus Eco (base) | – |
| Plate | – | nylon/Pebax plate |
| Fit | ||
| Support | stability | stability |
| Fit | standard | narrow |
| Sizing | – | go up half |
| Recommended runner weight | All runners, including heavy (90 kg+) | All runners, including heavy (90 kg+) |
| Best for | ||
| Best for | Long runsRace dayBeginnersWalkingRunners 90 kg+ | Easy runsBeginnersWalkingRunners 90 kg+ |
| Pros | Soft, bouncy FF Blast Max top layer · Stable firmer base layer · Plush heel and tongue padding · More breathable than the Kayano 32 · 8 mm drop · Comfortable on 20 km long runs · Safe option for a first full marathon · Suits flat, neutral and high arches | Bounce and energy return rare in a stability shoe · Strong, traditional stability: wide platform, raised medial foam, plate · Premium engineered mesh upper and build · Thick outsole with good traction · Foam expected to last 1,000 km · Great value at ₹6,000–9,000 |
| Cons | Durability doubts for runners over 90 kg · About 20% less structure than the Kayano 32 · Too soft for severe overpronators who dislike soft foam · Not for wide feet in the standard width · Expensive at ₹17,000 | Runs about a full size small · Snug fit even after sizing up · Not for fast paces around 4:00/km |
| Avoid if | Avoid it if you are over 90 kg with flat feet, or overpronate heavily and dislike soft foam; the Kayano 32 suits you better. | Avoid it if you want a shoe for fast running around 4:00/km pace. |