Compare shoes
Pick up to 3 shoes to see them side by side.
 ASICSGel-Kayano 33 |  ASICSGel-Nimbus 28 | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall | 8.33 | 7.50 |
| Ride | 8.0 | 6.5 |
| Design & Comfort | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| Value | 8.0 | 7.0 |
| Price | ||
| Price | ₹16,999 | ₹16,999 |
| Specs | ||
| Category | Stability | Max cushion |
| Weight | 300 g | 280 g |
| Heel stack | 39 mm | 43 mm |
| Forefoot stack | 31 mm | 35 mm |
| Drop | 8 mm | 8 mm |
| Foam | FF Blast Max (top) + FF Blast Plus Eco (base) | FF Blast Plus |
| Plate | – | – |
| Fit | ||
| Support | stability | – |
| Fit | standard | standard |
| Sizing | – | true to size |
| Recommended runner weight | All runners, including heavy (85 kg+) | All runners, including heavy (85 kg+) |
| Best for | ||
| Best for | Long runsRace dayBeginnersWalkingRunners 90 kg+ | Easy runsBeginnersWalkingRunners 90 kg+ |
| Pros | Soft, bouncy FF Blast Max top layer on a stable base · Plush heel and tongue padding · More breathable than the Kayano 32 · Comfortable on 20 km long runs · Safe option for a first full marathon | Outstanding step-in comfort · Plush upper, soft laces and thick heel padding · Extremely protective cushioning · True to size with good toe room · About 20 g lighter than the Nimbus 27 |
| Cons | Durability doubts for runners over 90 kg · About 20% less structure than the Kayano 32 · Not for wide feet in the standard width · Expensive at ₹17,000 | Foam felt flat on runs over 10 km after 100 km · Upper traps heat at faster paces · Narrower platform than the 27, less stable · Poor value at ₹17,000 next to a discounted Nimbus 27 |
| Avoid if | You are over 90 kg with flat feet, or overpronate heavily and dislike soft foam; the Kayano 32 suits you better. | You want one shoe for long runs or faster running. |