Compare shoes
Pick up to 3 shoes to see them side by side.
 NikeQuest 6 |  Ten x YouAeonic Recovery | |
|---|---|---|
| Scores | ||
| Overall | 6.00 | 7.00 |
| Ride | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Design & Comfort | 7.5 | 8.0 |
| Value | 5.5 | 8.0 |
| Price | ||
| Price | ₹10,000 | ₹8,000 |
| Specs | ||
| Category | Walking | Walking |
| Weight | 295 g | 390 g |
| Heel stack | – | 35 mm |
| Forefoot stack | – | 25 mm |
| Drop | – | 10 mm |
| Foam | – | – |
| Plate | – | – |
| Fit | ||
| Support | – | mild support |
| Fit | – | standard |
| Sizing | – | true to size |
| Recommended runner weight | Up to about 90 kg | Up to about 90 kg |
| Best for | ||
| Best for | BeginnersWalking | Walking |
| Pros | Highly durable, 500 to 800 km expected · Stable ride thanks to the firmer foam · Beginner friendly stability · Thicker upper, tongue and laces than Nike's other budget shoes · Thick, durable outsole rubber · Nice looking | Top-notch design and material quality · Real, soft arch support from a thick dual-density insole · All-day comfort for walking · Excellent tongue, laces and heel padding · Thick, anti-abrasion, anti-skid outsole |
| Cons | No energy return or propulsion · Very firm, with no softness in the forefoot · Doubtful impact protection · Overpriced at a ₹10,000 launch price · Not for serious runners or long runs | 390 g in UK 8 · Flat, hard, unresponsive midsole · Stiff forefoot · Almost no breathability · Toe box not as wide as claimed, narrow medial midfoot · ₹6,000 is too much for a shoe you can only run about 5 km in · Not suitable for tempo runs despite the marketing |
| Avoid if | Avoid it if you are a serious runner who wants a soft ride with energy return or a shoe for long runs. | Avoid it if you want a shoe for actual running beyond about 5 km or for any faster running. |